Chapter 9 · Concluding Remarks and Summary
The concluding chapter brings together the comparison of QKD, RKD, and MKD. It evaluates how the three approaches contribute to confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity, and relates their theoretical security promises to practical limits such as key rate, distance, infrastructure, cost, and organizational complexity.
A recurring conclusion is that one-time-pad confidentiality is only realistic when enough truly random key material is available. QKD and RKD can generate physical keys but are constrained by rate, range, and deployment conditions; MKD can transport much larger key volumes but requires secure generation, protected media, and controlled logistics. The chapter therefore distinguishes cryptographic strength from operational feasibility.
The chapter does not present a single universal winner. Instead, it summarizes where each technology fits: QKD for specialized high-security links with significant infrastructure, RKD for low-cost mobile or short-range cases, and MKD where large key volumes and physical transport are acceptable. It closes the book's decision-oriented comparison.
- Compares QKD, RKD, and MKD across the book's criteria
- Relates one-time-pad security to available key volume
- Summarizes infrastructure, cost, and range constraints
- Distinguishes theoretical security from deployability
- Provides a decision-oriented final assessment